Volume 7, Issue 2, March 2019, Page: 76-82
Digital Governance Model for Big Data Era----Based on Typical Practices in Singapore
Ting Lei, School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
Yuwei Tang, School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
Received: Apr. 19, 2019;       Published: Jun. 15, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.hss.20190702.15      View  48      Downloads  13
Abstract
[Research background] Different social forms determine different social governance models. With the development of the Internet of things, cloud computing and artificial intelligence, digital governance has entered the big data era. [Research questions and methods] What should be the digital governance model for the big data era? Krassimira believe that applying digital governance theory to guide smart city practice is an important step in governance theory in the field of urban governance. Singapore's "Smart nation 2025" is the first blueprint for a smart nation in the world. Taking the practice of Singapore's “smart nation 2025” as a case study, based on the theory of digital governance, from the three dimensions of digital economy, digital government and digital society, using the "institutional-organization-technology-behavior" analysis framework, this paper analyzes the context framework of Singapore's digital governance model, and summarizes the typical characteristics of Singapore's digital governance model. [Conclusion] The study found that Singapore has established a digital governance model in which governments, economic society, and civil society can collaborate and interact. Singapore has accumulated a wealth of digital governance experience[Contribution and limitation] Singapore's urban development is highly mature, and its digital governance has typical particularity, but the experience and enlightenment of Singapore's digital governance practice can provide a reference path for improving China's digital governance ability.
Keywords
Digital Governance Theory, Digital Governance Model, Experience and Enlightenment, Smart Nation 2025
To cite this article
Ting Lei, Yuwei Tang, Digital Governance Model for Big Data Era----Based on Typical Practices in Singapore, Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 7, No. 2, 2019, pp. 76-82. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20190702.15
Reference
[1]
Janowski T, Estevez E, Baguma R. Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizen-administration relationships in the digital age [J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2018, 35(4): S1-S16.
[2]
Wu Y, Zhang W, Shen J, et al. Smart city with Chinese characteristics against the background of big data: Idea, action and risk [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 173: 60-66.0.
[3]
Source of data:https://www.smartnation.sg/why-Smart-Nation
[4]
Keane M. Internet+ China: Unleashing the innovative nation strategy [J]. International journal of cultural and creative industries, 2016, 3(2): 68-74.
[5]
Curtis S. Cities and global governance: State failure or a new global order? [J]. Millennium, 2016, 44(3): 455-477.
[6]
Zhi, Y. F. 2002. E-government in digital era: Concept, practice, and development. J. International Journal of the Computer. (October. 2002), 1-22.
[7]
Roy, J. 2001. E-governance & Digital Government in Canada. J. Ifip Conference on Towards the E-society: E-commerce, 845-856.
[8]
Choi I. Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-Government [J]. 2016.
[9]
McCann E. Governing urbanism: Urban governance studies 1.0, 2.0 and beyond [J]. Urban Studies, 2017, 54(2): 312-326.
[10]
Meijer A J, Gil-Garcia J R, Bolívar M P R. Smart city research: Contextual conditions, governance models, and public value assessment [J]. Social Science Computer Review, 2016, 34(6): 647-656.
[11]
Lim C, Kim K J, Maglio P P. Smart cities with big data: Reference models, challenges, and considerations [J]. Cities, 2018, 82: 86-99.
[12]
Ruhlandt R W S. The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review [J]. Cities, 2018, 81: 1-23.
[13]
Liou K T. Government reform, public governance, and Chinese economic development [J]. Journal of Chinese Governance, 2017, 2(3): 255-270.
[14]
Khatoun R, Zeadally S. Smart cities: concepts, architectures, research opportunities [J]. Commun. Acm, 2016, 59(8): 46-57.
[15]
Yigitcanlar T, Kamruzzaman M. Does smart city policy lead to sustainability of cities? [J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 73: 49-58.
[16]
Castelnovo W, Misuraca G, Savoldelli A. Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making [J]. Social Science Computer Review, 2016, 34(6): 724-739.
Browse journals by subject